We Should Expand the Supreme Court, A Debate
(eVideo)
Contributors
Published
[Place of publication not identified] : Intelligence Squared US,, [2021].
Status
Description
Loading Description...
Subjects
LC Subjects
More Details
Format
eVideo
Language
English
Notes
General Note
Originally released by Intelligence Squared US, 2021.
General Note
Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Infobase on December 29, 2021.
Restrictions on Access
Access requires authentication through Classroom Video On Demand.
Description
Since 1869, the U.S. Supreme Court has consisted of nine justices. Nothing in the U.S. Constitution, however, determines the number of justices—that is up to Congress—and in its first 80 years of existence, its membership varied from six to ten. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D, 1933–45)—angry at the Court's nullification of some of his New Deal programs and claiming the justices were out of touch with the American people—urged Congress to expand the number of seats so he could make new appointments. Congress refused and kept the number at nine. Today, some advocates on the left are again urging the Court's expansion. The tribunal is dominated by conservative justices who don't reflect the views of most Americans, they argue, and several politically motivated appointments have moved the Court far to the right, undermining its legitimacy. An expanded Court, they contend, would restore its equilibrium and authority. Not so fast, opponents argue. A move to dramatically change one of the three core pillars of the U.S. government would itself undermine the Court’s legitimacy, they charge, and make the tribunal more partisan. Tinkering with the number of justices would further polarize the Court, they contend, and compromise its independence. Should the Supreme Court be expanded?
Target Audience
9 - 12
System Details
Streaming video file.
System Details
System requirements: Classroom Video On Demand playback platform.
Citations
APA Citation, 7th Edition (Style Guide)
(2021). We Should Expand the Supreme Court, A Debate. Intelligence Squared US.
Chicago / Turabian - Author Date Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)2021. We Should Expand the Supreme Court, A Debate. Intelligence Squared US.
Chicago / Turabian - Humanities (Notes and Bibliography) Citation, 18th Edition (Style Guide)We Should Expand the Supreme Court, A Debate. Intelligence Squared US, 2021.
UCL Harvard Citation (Style Guide)(2021). We should expand the supreme court, A debate. [Place of publication not identified]: Intelligence Squared US.
MLA Citation, 9th Edition (Style Guide)We Should Expand the Supreme Court, A Debate. Intelligence Squared US, 2021.
Note: Citations contain only title, author, edition, and publisher. Only UCL Harvard citations contain the year published. Citations should be used as a guideline and should be double checked for accuracy. Citation formats are based on standards as of May 2025.
Staff View
Grouped Work ID
1de7f743-ec45-c975-5539-500db0fb7cdf-eng
Grouping Information
Grouped Work ID | 1de7f743-ec45-c975-5539-500db0fb7cdf-eng |
---|---|
Full title | we should expand the supreme court a debate |
Author | infobase |
Grouping Category | movie |
Last Update | 2023-01-17 14:42:32PM |
Last Indexed | 2025-06-21 23:00:53PM |
Book Cover Information
Image Source | classroomVideoOnDemand |
---|---|
First Loaded | Nov 16, 2024 |
Last Used | Apr 13, 2025 |
Marc Record
First Detected | Jan 17, 2023 02:45:35 PM |
---|---|
Last File Modification Time | Jan 17, 2023 02:45:35 PM |
MARC Record
LEADER | 03138ngm a2200457Ic 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1000276370 | ||
003 | CVOD | ||
005 | 20220111024137.0 | ||
006 | m o c | ||
007 | vz|czazuu | ||
007 | cr cna | ||
008 | 220111p20212021nyu063 o v|eng d | ||
028 | 4 | 0 | |a 276370|b Infobase |
035 | |a 1000276370 | ||
040 | |a AzPhAEM|b eng|e rda | ||
041 | 0 | |a eng|h eng | |
046 | |k 2021 | ||
245 | 0 | 0 | |a We Should Expand the Supreme Court, A Debate /|c Intelligence Squared US. |
264 | 1 | |a [Place of publication not identified] : |b Intelligence Squared US, |c [2021] | |
264 | 3 | 2 | |a New York, N.Y. :|b Distributed by Infobase, |c 2021. |
264 | 4 | |c ©2021 | |
300 | |a 1 online resource (1 video file (1 hr., 3 min., 3 sec)) :|b sound. | ||
336 | |a two-dimensional moving image|b tdi|2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a computer|b c|2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a online resource|b cr|2 rdacarrier | ||
347 | |a video file|2 rda | ||
500 | |a Originally released by Intelligence Squared US, 2021. | ||
500 | |a Streaming video file encoded with permission for digital streaming by Infobase on December 29, 2021. | ||
506 | 1 | |a Access requires authentication through Classroom Video On Demand. | |
520 | |a Since 1869, the U.S. Supreme Court has consisted of nine justices. Nothing in the U.S. Constitution, however, determines the number of justices—that is up to Congress—and in its first 80 years of existence, its membership varied from six to ten. In 1937, President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D, 1933–45)—angry at the Court's nullification of some of his New Deal programs and claiming the justices were out of touch with the American people—urged Congress to expand the number of seats so he could make new appointments. Congress refused and kept the number at nine. Today, some advocates on the left are again urging the Court's expansion. The tribunal is dominated by conservative justices who don't reflect the views of most Americans, they argue, and several politically motivated appointments have moved the Court far to the right, undermining its legitimacy. An expanded Court, they contend, would restore its equilibrium and authority. Not so fast, opponents argue. A move to dramatically change one of the three core pillars of the U.S. government would itself undermine the Court’s legitimacy, they charge, and make the tribunal more partisan. Tinkering with the number of justices would further polarize the Court, they contend, and compromise its independence. Should the Supreme Court be expanded? | ||
521 | 2 | |a 9 - 12 | |
538 | |a Streaming video file. | ||
538 | |a System requirements: Classroom Video On Demand playback platform. | ||
588 | |a Title from distributor's description | ||
650 | 0 | |a Courts. | |
650 | 0 | |a Law. | |
655 | 7 | |a Internet videos.|2 lcgft | |
710 | 2 | |a Infobase,|e film distributor. | |
710 | 2 | |a Intelligence Squared US (Firm) | |
856 | 4 | 0 | |z Part of the Classroom Video On Demand collection.|u https://cvod.infobase.com/PortalPlaylists.aspx?xtid=276370&wID=277820 |
856 | 4 | 2 | |z Cover image|u https://cfvod.kaltura.com/p/1067292/sp/106729200/thumbnail/entry_id/1_m6xj276u/version/100021/width/88 |